Sunday, October 11, 2009 
National Coming Out Day

Today is National Coming Out Day, a day to promote awareness of lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender people. For anyone who doesn't already know: I'm bisexual.

I'm married to Emma. That leads people to tacitly assume that I'm straight. Too often, I do little or nothing to challenge that assumption, either from straight people or gay people.

I came out in grad school, a couple of years after leaving Ireland. It was difficult at first, but ultimately rewarding.

I'm married to a woman, but I could have ended up with a male partner, a partner whom I could not legally marry in Washington state. Emma and I married because anything else is second class. This is the root of my passionate involvement with the Approve 71 campaign. It's also why I've been a leader of BiNet Seattle for more than a decade.

The National Equality March takes place in Washington DC this weekend. Forty years after the Stonewall riots, LGBT people are rallying for equal protection in all matters. This is also the Seattle LGBT Equality Weekend.

There's a march this afternoon, starting from Volunteer Park at 2pm. I'll be there. Will you?

PS Let me refer you to Tim Wilson's Coming Out as Good Citizenship.

posted on Sunday, October 11, 2009 6:50:51 PM (Pacific Daylight Time, UTC-07:00) 
#    Comments [0]
Saturday, October 10, 2009 
Approve71 silhouette

I'm breaking radio silence to explain the uncharacteristic drought of blog posts. In my last post, I mentioned that I had created a Twibbon overlay for Approve71.org, allowing you to overlay Approve71's badge over your Twitter icon.

The next day I went over to Approve71's headquarters and introduced myself to the tech team, Josh, Joe, and Adam. One thing led to another, and I spent that weekend writing my first-ever PHP code, which allowed you to upload a photo to Approve71's website, stamp a banner on it, and then save it so that you could subsequently upload it to Facebook for your profile picture.

It's been a big success, used a couple of thousand times.

Since then, I spent a lot of time working on a second version, which lets you crop the photo (using imgAreaSelect) and choose from a set of overlay banners. Some of the banners are for the NO on 1 campaign in Maine, where they're fighting an attempted repeal of their same-sex marriage law.

George on Facebook George on Facebook

The second site went live earlier this week. Try it out: Create a Profile Picture.

posted on Saturday, October 10, 2009 6:59:44 PM (Pacific Daylight Time, UTC-07:00) 
#    Comments [0]
Thursday, September 10, 2009 
Approve Referendum 71

I spent 90 minutes phonebanking for Approve 71 after work today. I called voters who had already been identified as leaning progressive and asked them to vote APPROVE on Referendum 71 in November.

Under the recent Domestic Partnership law (SB 5688 aka the “everything but marriage bill”), registered domestic partners (same-sex couples and opposite-sex couples with at least one partner over age 62), and married couples, are now treated equally under the law in all parts of Washington state.

The Religious Right objected and put together an initiative which scraped together just enough signatures to be on the ballot. They'll be voting to REJECT the bill, which would overturn domestic partnerships in this state.

Civil rights should not be subject to a vote. It's important not to have a repeat of last year's Proposition 8 debacle in California. It's important to me personally and I'm putting time and money into the campaign.

If you want to join the effort, sign up at Approve71.org, and become a fan on Facebook.

Phonebanking will take place regularly in Seattle and other locations. In Seattle, it's happening at the Equal Rights Washington offices at 7th & Columbia, beside the freeway offramp. If you have a laptop with Skype, bring it along.

See you there.

posted on Friday, September 11, 2009 6:39:12 AM (Pacific Daylight Time, UTC-07:00) 
#    Comments [0]
Monday, August 31, 2009 
Approve Referendum 71

Approve Referendum 71. If you're eligible to vote in Washington state in November, remember this: Approve Referendum 71.

On May 18, 2009, Governor Gregoire signed Senate Bill 5688, aka the “everything but marriage bill” or the Domestic Partnership Law, a law ensuring that all Washington families are treated the same, with the same protections, the same rights, and the same obligations as their neighbors. Under this law, registered domestic partners (same-sex couples and opposite-sex couples with at least one partner over age 62), and married couples, are treated equally under the law in all parts of the state.

Key rights and obligations in the law include:

  • Death benefits for the partners of police and firefighters killed in the line of duty.
  • Pension benefits for the partners of teachers and other public employees.
  • Victims' rights, including the right to receive notifications and benefits allowances.
  • The right to use sick leave to care for a seriously ill partner.
  • The right to workers' compensation benefits if a partner is killed in the course of employment.
  • The right to receive unemployment benefits if an employee must leave a job to care for a seriously ill partner.
  • The right to adopt a partner's child without paying for a home study.

The areas covered by the law include labor and employment law; pensions, survivor and other public employee benefits; family law; insurance rights; higher education; banks, financial institutions and loan agencies; creditors' rights and business licenses.

Opponents of the domestic partnership law are seeking to repeal it. Referendum 71 would ask voters whether the law should be approved or rejected. A vote to "APPROVE" keeps the law so that all families will have these protections in all parts of the state.

The Religious Right promptly put together a ballot initiative to strike down the new DP law. They gathered signatures, but submitted barely enough to qualify. For the last few weeks, the office of the Secretary of State has been verifying the initiative signatures. It was too close to tell one way or another whether they would pass. Today, they limped past the threshold of 120,577 verified signatures with a margin of about 900.

Final certification is expected on Wednesday by the Secretary of State. Barring a successful challenge by Washington Families Standing Together, Referendum 71 will be on the ballot in November.

Putting rights up for a vote is indecent. Stripping citizens of hard-won rights is fundamentally unfair.

Please spread the word. Tell everyone to Approve Referendum 71.

The wording is confusing but remember that you're voting to affirm the recently passed law.

I expect this to be a difficult battle. The Religious Right is well-funded and well-organized, they're already fired up and angry about everything Obama does, and liberal turnout tends to be down in odd-numbered years.

If you can spare some money, please make a donation to WAFST.

By the way, don't assume that you're correctly registered to vote. Please check that you're currently registered. Check that your friends are registered too.

Approve Referendum 71, for fairness.

posted on Monday, August 31, 2009 8:46:38 AM (Pacific Daylight Time, UTC-07:00) 
#    Comments [0]
Saturday, July 11, 2009 
Golden Gardens Beach

Two picnics this weekend.

Today we held the tenth annual BiNet Seattle picnic for the bisexual community, which I once again organized, with some help from Emma. Almost all of the preceding ones were held at Ravenna Park. Even though I booked the picnic back in March, Ravenna Park was unavailable this weekend, which was the only weekend that really suited me. We went to Golden Gardens Beach instead. It's a nice park, but parking is atrocious on a busy weekend, which may explain the poor turnout. There were only 10 people, down from 20–30 for the last few years. Three new faces; the rest were regulars. As usual, Emma and I brought the meat, charcoal, plates, and tools, and did the cooking.

Tomorrow's picnic will be before the open-air production of Comedy of Errors at the Seward Park Amphitheater. This one's easy: no-one's cooking. We're just bringing food that's ready to eat.

posted on Sunday, July 12, 2009 5:48:33 AM (Pacific Daylight Time, UTC-07:00) 
#    Comments [0]
Friday, July 03, 2009 
Motssers after Dim Sum

Barely a month ago, while cleaning up Frank Maloney's Facebook account, I became aware of Portland Motsscon XXII.

I discovered the soc.motss newsgroup back in 1989, when I arrived in America as a grad student at Brown and had steady access to Usenet. MOTSS = members of the same sex, an opaque euphemism for gay attraction, which helped the group be created with a minimum of fuss in 1983.

I lurked on soc.motss for two years. I knew that I was bisexual, but I wasn't ready to admit it to anyone. Then my friend Éamonn came out as gay and I promptly came out to him. After a few months of footdragging, I came out on soc.motss and became a regular participant on the group.

Frank was a mainstay of soc.motss. He was the first person that I looked up when I moved to Seattle in 1992; we promptly became fast friends.

Me at the DC Con in 95

I went to three of the annual conventions, the motsscons: Portland in 1992, Las Vegas in 1994, and Washington DC in 1995. I had affairs at a couple of those cons, first with Ry, later with Alan. Cons were big in the heyday of soc.motss: seventy to a hundred or more people attended them.

Soc.motss itself was big and noisy in the early to mid-90s, as hordes of people got dialup access to the Internet. I recall that there being more than 100 messages per day, with several hundred active and semi-active posters.

By the late 90s, things had changed. The Usenet newsgroups were in massive decline, with everyone moving to the Web. My own life had become busier. I was back at Microsoft; I was trying to write Beginning ATL COM Programming, while undergoing a half-year death march to ship IIS 4; and I had fallen in love with Emma. I gradually stopped reading the newsgroups, though soc.motss was among the last that I gave up.

I looked in a few times over the following decade and Frank would tell me news from soc.motss once in a while, since he continued to participate until his death. Over the past year, I resumed contact with several motssers on Facebook, where most of the soc.motss community seems to hang out now, and that was good.

So, when I learned that this year's motsscon was to be in Portland again, I was tempted but a little wary after my long absence. I also had commitments, since it coincided with Seattle's Pride, last weekend. I thought about it for ten days and decided that I really wanted to go. I told BiNet Seattle that I couldn't march and Freely Speaking Toastmasters that I couldn't staff our table.

The con started on Thursday evening with a foodie dinner at Sel Gris. On Friday, the con goers drove along the Columbia to see the waterfalls. I worked on Friday and took the evening train down from Seattle. Alan collected me at the station and brought me to the Mark Spencer hotel, where we shared a room for the weekend. We joined the party in the basement about 10 o'clock after several people had gotten to bed.

This con was much smaller than the ones I went to a decade and a half ago, about 25 people in all. All to the good in my opinion, as everyone could hang out with everyone else. I didn't have the feeling of being lost in the crowd this time. I had a friendly warm reception, both from old friends not seen in years, and from people I hadn't known before, even online. Everyone looked older and grayer of course; no surprise after 15 years.

Motssers at the Japanese Garden

(This photo is one of the few moments when everyone had fallen silent. There was constant, convivial chatter.)

Saturday opened with a trip to the impressive Farmers' Market, where Alan and I had breakfast and wandered for a little while. Alan headed off to Cannon Beach to a friend's wedding. I made my own way to the Saturday Market on the river, where I found Rod, Chuk, Josh, and Jack, and I finally had a chance to talk to my compatriot Rod after all these years. We walked back together to the hotel.

I had signed up for Kathryn's energetic hike on the grounds that this wasn't a crowd of triathletes and it wouldn't be that energetic. But Max's Steve had dropped out of the Segway trip, and after a couple of calls for someone to take the spot, I plumped to join the Segway trip.

Segways in a line

After lunch, ten of us assembled at the “undisclosed location”, a shabby parking lot near the Portland Opera, where we found a trailer full of Segways. While we broiled under the hot sun, the tour guides laboriously filled out paperwork, making each of us inspect every nick and dent on our Segways, filled out credit card details and phoned them in, and provided disclaimer forms for us to sign. At last, we were instructed how to ride our Segway i2s. Some of us had ridden older models; I was a first-timer. It took a few minutes to get the hang of mounting and dismounting, but it quickly became natural. We had a half an hour of practice in the lot before heading out on our tour.

We headed north along the east side of the Willamette riverfront, crossed at the Steel Bridge, then went south on the other side of the river, past Saturday Market, down to River Drive, where we took a much-needed break, before retracing our route. Two hours it took us, two hours in the hot sun. I hadn't adequately slathered myself in sun cream and came close to sunstroke. That aside, it was a blast, swooping around on the Segways, amidst the throngs on the riverfront. The tourguides had many opportunities to hand out leaflets.

Robert, Mike, and Rod  at the Farm Cafe

Back to the hotel to cool down and rest before dinner. A dozen of us ate at the Farm Cafe; the rest ate at the Blue Moon Tavern. All of us who ate at the Farm Cafe came away very satisfied. Their ingredients were fresh and local, cooked expertly and presented well, in an agreeable atmosphere. I sat at one end of the table with Robert, Mike, and David.

Long after the other party left the Blue Moon, we finished our desserts and headed back to the Mark Spencer hotel, where we all hung out for the rest of the evening. Another sign of getting older: at earlier cons, a crowd would have headed out to the bars till the not-so-early hours. Tim and Mack said their goodbyes and slipped off.

Mobbing Powell's the moment it opened

Come the morning and I still hadn't got to Powell's, even though it was only two blocks away. I realized that if I went there when it opened at 9am, I could spend nearly an hour there before I had to check out of my room and go to Dim Sum. I arrived at the moment they opened their doors and a crowd of 20 people swarmed in. The last time I was there, I bought a pile of mysteries. This time, I went for science fiction and fantasy, and came away with 15 or 20 books, mostly by authors I hadn't tried before.

Off to Dim Sum at Legin, way out in the burbs. Apparently the good restaurants have moved out of Chinatown. We crowded around two large tables and tucked in to an amazing amount of food for a very reasonable price. I sat between Rod and Kathryn and enjoyed their company very much. Ry came in for Dim Sum, but I only managed to talk to him for a brief time. He told me that he hated me for how well preserved I was; I told him that it was my revenge for being so damn babyfaced in my twenties.

Group photos were taken in front of Legin and we said goodbye to Rod, who had a lunchtime flight home.

Back to the hotel again to digest our brunch and rest up for a couple of hours before heading up to the Japanese Garden. I decided that I needed a caffeine fix and Sim accompanied me back to Powell's, where we sat in the cafe and talked for half an hour. We spent a few minutes perusing the stacks. I was good this time and bought only one book.

Japanese Garden

Kathryn persuaded several people that it was only a mile's walk to the Japanese Garden. Almost two, according to Google Maps, much of it uphill, but I took the easy way, Alan's car. It seemed like all of Portland had the same idea—we had to park half a mile uphill from the entrance.

Despite the crowds, the Japanese Garden was serene and shady and we ambled and chatted for more than an hour. I wore a long-sleeved shirt with the collar turned up to cover my sunburned neck and arms. I took the opportunity to introduce myself to the few remaining people who I didn't know, Stephanie and Chris. After, we all headed down to the adjacent Rose Garden, where we wandered for a while.

Back to the hotel once more: the final time for me as I was catching the 6:15 train back to Seattle. I grabbed a sandwich at Kenny & Zuke's across the street, and said goodbye to everyone at the hotel. Alan dropped me off at the train station then joined the others at Navarre's for another much-acclaimed dinner.

I've acquired a number of new Facebook friends in the past week, everyone I think that I wasn't already friending.

I'm extremely glad that I went. I enjoyed every minute of it. Unlike earlier cons, I never felt out of things. Partly this was due to maturity and better social skills on my part, but largely I think it was due to the smaller, friendlier group.

Emma declined to accompany me down, as she didn't know anyone except Alan and thought she'd find it a strain to listen to lots of strangers reminiscing about unfamiliar events and people. It would have been, a little, but I'm sure she would have been welcomed.

Finally, my thanks to our hosts, Kathryn, David, and Chuk, for such a marvelous job and much hard work before and during the con.

My photos can be found at Flickr.

posted on Friday, July 03, 2009 8:16:39 AM (Pacific Daylight Time, UTC-07:00) 
#    Comments [2]
Wednesday, June 17, 2009 
Dozens of gay rights protesters demonstrate outside the Beverly Hills hotel in Los Angeles in May.

Candidate Obama talked a great line in gay rights, selling himself as a “fierce advocate”. He'd get rid of the Defense of Marriage Act, Don't Ask Don't Tell, and more.

President Obama has been a big disappointment on gay rights. He hasn't done anything about DADT, he hasn't spoken out about gay marriage, he hasn't made any gay appointments. John Aravosis has a good roundup at Salon.

But now a shitstorm has blown up. On Friday, the Department of Justice filed a brief in defense of DOMA. First of all, the DoJ is not actually required to defend all laws. More importantly, the brief was gratuitously offensive, invoking incest and pedophilia.

People are outraged. A major fundraiser for the Democratic National Committee celebrating the 40th anniversary of Stonewall is falling apart as the attendees are declining to attend.

I don't know what's going on in the White House, but I don't like it.

posted on Thursday, June 18, 2009 4:51:44 AM (Pacific Daylight Time, UTC-07:00) 
#    Comments [0]
Tuesday, May 26, 2009 
Day of Decision Rally, Seattle

The California Supreme Court handed down their decision about Proposition 8 today: they're letting it stand. No new gay marriages, though the 18,000 same-sex marriages that were enacted last year remain valid.

It's a setback to be sure. The silver lining is that the gay community has been fired up since Proposition 8 passed in November.

There's a small but real danger that Referendum 71 will make it on to the ballot here in Washington state. It would roll back the everything-but-marriage domestic partnership law that passed recently.

posted on Wednesday, May 27, 2009 5:42:08 AM (Pacific Daylight Time, UTC-07:00) 
#    Comments [0]
Wednesday, May 06, 2009 
Dominoes Falling

A month ago, Vermont and Iowa passed gay marriage laws. Today, Maine and New Hampshire did the same. The Maine Governor has already signed it into law. The NH legislature passed a law, but it's possible their governor will veto it.

It's as if there were a pro-gay marriage backlash after the anti-gay marriage Proposition 8 passed in California last year. Courts and legislatures are realizing the fundamental unfairness of denying the benefits of marriage to all committed couples. The sky didn't fall when Massachusetts legalized gay marriage five years ago.

There's no immediate prospect of a gay marriage law being enacted in Washington State. Last month, the state legislature passed a law extending all of the state-given benefits of being married to registered domestic partners. There was some talk amongst the Religious Right of a ballot initiative to repeal this DP benefits law, but there seems to be little appetite for it. 40–45% of Washington state voters favor gay marriage, while another 20–25% favor domestic partnerships.

In other news, today is the ninth anniversary of my wedding to Emma. Our marriage doesn't feel at all threatened by events in New England.

posted on Thursday, May 07, 2009 6:35:37 AM (Pacific Daylight Time, UTC-07:00) 
#    Comments [0]
Tuesday, April 07, 2009 
Marriage in Vermont

On Friday, the Iowa Supreme Court struck down their state's gay marriage ban. Today, the Vermont Legislature legalized gay marriage.

It's been a great week for fairness. We still have a long way to go: 29 states have constitutional amendments banning gay marriage.

I'm sure the right wing are beating the fund-raising drums for all they're worth. We can expect more Proposition 8-style backlashes, I'm afraid.

But the news still made my day.

posted on Wednesday, April 08, 2009 6:57:05 AM (Pacific Daylight Time, UTC-07:00) 
#    Comments [0]
Friday, April 03, 2009 
Iowa Ruling

I am greatly heartened by today's news of Iowa's Supreme Court unanimously striking down the state's gay marriage ban. The passage of Proposition 8 in California was a setback. The Iowa Court made a strong ruling, gutting the arguments against same-sex marriage.

It's hard to believe now that interracial marriage was illegal in many states until 1967. President Obama's parents could not have married in those states. We look back at that now with bemusement and a little horror. The opposition, then as now, was led by cultural conservatives, making religious arguments.

Someday soon, we'll look back at the gay marriage debate with the same bemusement and wonder what all the fuss was about.

posted on Saturday, April 04, 2009 6:59:14 AM (Pacific Daylight Time, UTC-07:00) 
#    Comments [0]
Saturday, February 21, 2009 
Eric's hand over bingo cards

Emma, Eric, and I went to Gay Bingo this evening. It's a monthly fundraiser for the Lifelong AIDS Alliance. This is not your grandmother's church bingo: the Sisters of Perpetual Indulgence are the ushers and the show is MC'd by a drag queen.

Every Gay Bingo has a theme. Tonight's was the Love Boat, the campy 70's TV show. Many in the audience dress for the occasion. I wore the nearest thing to a lounge suit that I had; Emma accessorized a nautical top with a scarf. We brought Jill and Dick the last time we went. They have an enormous collection of costumes and they were some of their choice Fifties glad rags.

I've been there perhaps ten times over the last 15 years. For the first decade, it was held in the basement of a synagogue on Capitol Hill. It was always packed. Finally, they moved to a larger space, the South Lake Union Naval Reserve building, a few years ago. That's always packed too.

It's always a lot of fun. And for a good cause too.

posted on Sunday, February 22, 2009 7:37:24 AM (Pacific Standard Time, UTC-08:00) 
#    Comments [0]
Monday, February 09, 2009 
Facebook Groups

As you can see from the attached picture, I just created Facebook Groups for three social organizations that I'm involved in: Freely Speaking Toastmasters, Wild Geese Players of Seattle, and BiNet Seattle.

I set up a LinkedIn group for FSTM too.

posted on Tuesday, February 10, 2009 7:47:24 AM (Pacific Standard Time, UTC-08:00) 
#    Comments [0]
Saturday, November 15, 2008 

Seattle Protest March against Proposition 8

I mentioned the other day there were to be protest marches all over the country today against Proposition 8, the anti-gay marriage amendment that passed last week in California.

Thousands marched in Seattle, from Volunteer Park to Westlake Center. The P-I and the Seattle Times say 3,000. The Stranger says 6,000. I was one of them. It was a lot. Westlake was jammed.

The crowd was in good spirits. Pissed off at the votes in California, Florida, Arizona, and Arkansas, but determined to keep on fighting. Certain that time and right are on our side, that we will in the end triumph.

Equal Rights Washington is coordinating the fight in this state. Give them your time and money.

posted on Sunday, November 16, 2008 7:57:43 AM (Pacific Standard Time, UTC-08:00) 
#    Comments [0]
Wednesday, November 12, 2008 
National Protest against Prop 8

Angry about the passage of Proposition 8, the anti-gay marriage amendment in California, and other anti-gay measures in Florida, Arizona, and Arkansas?

A nationwide protest is planned for 10:30am PST on Saturday, November 15th. The Seattle protest starts at Volunteer Park. Festivities begin at 10:30, the rally begins at noon, then we'll march down to Westlake, concluding with a rally there at 2:00.

The Stranger has more background.

I'll be there. Will you?

In the meantime, watch two moving videos from Keith Olbermann and Sam Harris.

posted on Thursday, November 13, 2008 6:55:49 AM (Pacific Standard Time, UTC-08:00) 
#    Comments [1]
Monday, November 10, 2008 
Freely Speaking Toastmasters

I'm the Secretary/Webmaster of Freely Speaking Toastmasters, a club whose membership is primarily LGBT, but is open to all. We were chartered in September 1988. I joined in 2004, after I left Microsoft and hence Microsoft Toastmasters.

We're so proud of being 20 years old that we've celebrated twice! We had a brunch for the current membership back in September, and tonight we had a party for current, former, and would-be members.

Not a huge turnout, but a lot of fun. Many of us spoke about what had drawn us to FSTM and what set it apart from other clubs for us.

I've been a member (and officer) of three Toastmasters clubs, FSTM, Microsoft Toastmasters, and Atlas Impressions—a club that I helped found last year, before I left Atlas. The two work clubs are fine in their own right, but each of them allots only an hour for the meeting, which is only barely enough. FSTM meets 7:00–8:30pm on Monday evenings at Group Health on Capitol Hill, and the extra half hour allows for a more relaxed pace. In particular, not only does each prepared speech get a formal evaluation, it also gets five minutes of open evaluation from the audience. The open evaluation is unusual in Toastmasters clubs. I feel that it engages the audience and it invariably gives rise to several suggestions and criticisms that the evaluator overlooked. FSTM is much more social than the two work clubs, and the membership is rather more diverse than high-tech workers.

posted on Tuesday, November 11, 2008 7:45:19 AM (Pacific Standard Time, UTC-08:00) 
#    Comments [0]
Friday, November 07, 2008 
Bert and Ernie: Support Gay Marriage

There was only sour note to the huge victories in Tuesday's elections: the passage of Proposition 8, the anti-gay marriage amendment in California. A deceitful campaign preyed on voters' fears and homophobia. The No on 8 campaign was massively outspent and not very effective.

I'm convinced that marriage equality will come, but this is a setback. Gay couples, who only gained the right to marry earlier this year in California, have lost that right.

The Mormon Church was the prime mover behind the Yes on 8 campaign, donating $19 million, nearly 80% of the total raised. A backlash is brewing. John Aravosis of AmericaBlog is trying to organize a boycott of Utah. Others are trying to get the tax-exempt status of the Latter Day Saints repealed: sign the petition.

[First in a series of daily posts for NaBloPoMo, the National Blog Posting Month, which I just found out about.]

posted on Saturday, November 08, 2008 6:58:47 AM (Pacific Standard Time, UTC-08:00) 
#    Comments [0]
Wednesday, February 06, 2008 

http://www.georgevreilly.com/blog/content/binary/maureenpeel2.png

I sent this letter to the New York Times this morning:

I was struck by the juxtaposition of Anya Kamenetz's thoughtful column and Maureen Dowd's puerile nonsense on today's op-ed page.

Anya Kamenetz's makes a sensible proposal on empowering ready teenagers by lowering the age thresholds for voting, drinking, credit cards when they demonstrate maturity.

Maureen Dowd continues in her usual rut, going on again about Cheneyesque paranoia, Bill's legacy, Obambi, and tough dames.

Perhaps Ms. Dowd could take Ms. Kamenetz's maturity test.

We attended a Super Tuesday party last night. As a PCO, I know a fair bit about the local caucus process, but I was unable to give a good answer about who the super delegates are. What should I find in my email as soon as I got home, but a list of the Washington State super delegates.

Elected Officials

  • Rep. Rick Larsen (2nd District)

  • Rep. Brian Baird (3rd District)

  • Rep. Norm Dicks (6th District)

  • Rep. Jim McDermott (7th District)

  • Gov. Chris Gregoire

Democratic National Committee Members

  • Dwight Pelz - WA Democratic Party Chair

  • Eileen Macoll - WA Vice Chair

  • Ed Cote (coed@pacifier.com)

  • Sharon Mast (skmast@att.net)

  • David McDonald (davidm@prestongates.com)

Already Endorsed Obama

  • Rep. Adam Smith (WA)

  • Pat Noter WA DNC Member

Already Endorsed Clinton

  • Sen. Maria Cantwell (WA)

  • Rep. Jay Inslee (WA)

  • Former Speaker Tom Foley (WA)

  • Sen. Patty Murray (WA)

  • Ron Sims (WA)

Finally ...

Methinks the lady doth protest too much, -or-, please don't throw me in the briar patch. Conservapedia's most viewed pages:

  1. Homosexuality [2,329,656]

  2. Main Page [2,221,503]

  3. Teen Homosexuality [409,064]

  4. Arguments Against Homosexuality [329,586]

  5. Homosexual Agenda [326,164]

  6. Ex-homosexuals [314,408]

  7. Homosexuality and Choice [309,297]

  8. Homosexuality and Anal Cancer [297,073]

  9. Homosexuality and Health [290,954]

  10. Wikipedia [290,439]

posted on Wednesday, February 06, 2008 6:32:38 PM (Pacific Standard Time, UTC-08:00) 
#    Comments [0]
Thursday, January 17, 2008 

http://images.ctv.ca/archives/CTVNews/img2/20070618/160_no_fly_list_070618.jpg

Miscellaneous links.

  • I mentioned Schneier on security theater recently. Via Pavel, I see that Schneier notes that a five-year-old was detained at SeaTac because his name appeared on a no-fly list.

  • Male fruit flies, when drunk, become much more likely to court other male fruit flies. Or, Oh God, I was so drunk ...

  • Health insurance companies are making out like bandits in Washington state.

  • Here's a damning RIAA interview, via Gabriel:

    When asked why the RIAA is going after an easy target--college students--the response made me cringe: "College students have reached a stage in life when their music habits are crystallized," Duckworth said. "And their appreciation for intellectual property has not yet reached its full development."

  • A useful, non-partisan guide to the caucus process in Washington state, via Will and Amy.

  • From Charlie Stross, fundies say the darndest things:

    • "Everyone knows scientists insist on using complex terminology to make it harder for True Christians to refute their claims. Deoxyribonucleic Acid, for example... sounds impressive, right? But have you ever seen what happens if you put something in acid? It dissolves! If we had all this acid in our cells, we'd all dissolve! So much for the Theory of Evolution, Check MATE!"

    • "A woman wants to abort a rape child? She should have thought of that before she walked down that dark alley without a male prescence, not to mention she should have thought before putting on revealing attire."

    • "Apes are just creatures twisted by Satan to mock Jesus by giving EVILolition credibility. Further more they are naturally lust crazed for human women. Since they are not natural creatures they should be exterminated forthwith as the tools of evil they are."

  • From the comments on Charlie's post, a very long set of answers from much more thoughtful people on what they've changed their minds about.

posted on Thursday, January 17, 2008 8:33:49 AM (Pacific Standard Time, UTC-08:00) 
#    Comments [0]
Wednesday, August 29, 2007 

http://talkingpointsmemo.com/images/larry-craig-mug-muck.jpg

I'm traveling in Europe at present (Ireland last week, Italy this week and next), so I have little opportunity to keep up with U.S. news, but the Larry Craig case leapt out at me. Craig is the second U.S. Senator to be exposed in the last few months as a major sexual hypocrite who espouses 'family values' but can't keep his pecker in his pants. Schadenfreude is just the right term for the pleasure I take in seeing these dickwads hoist on their own petards.

David Vitter (brother of one of my professors at Brown, Jeff Vitter) repeatedly consorted with prostitutes. Larry Craig has pled guilty to soliciting sex in a men's restroom, joining the long line of homophobic Republican closet cases, such as Mark Foley, Ted Haggard, Mayor Jim West of Spokane, and Florida State Representative Bob Allen. The homosexual homophobes particularly irk me. I don't know what particular pathology drives them to be so homophobic. All of the names that I just mentioned repeatedly went out of their way to attack gay people, to deny them equality, to whip up fear around gay marriage. Is it self-loathing, a hatred of their own forbidden sexuality? Is it a cynical act of misdirection: to be so virulently homophobic that no-one could possibly think that they're secretly sucking dick. In the end, I don't really care: I'm just glad to see them taken down, while enjoying the irony of the manner of their political demise.

I do feel sorry for those like Gov. Jim McGreevey of New Jersey, who sublimated their sexuality and hid in the closet for years, but who did not hypocritically attack fellow gay people. (Though McGreevey apparently abused his office and sent sweet deals his boyfriend's way.)

I have some experience of the closet myself, as I hid my bisexuality for a decade before coming out. It's an ugly, fearful place to be, and no-one should ever have to hide such a fundamental part of their makeup, but that's no excuse for virulent homophobia.

Alan asks a good question: Why were the police staking out an airport bathroom in the first place? Sex stings for acts between consenting adults are a waste of taxpayer money, and a way to punish closeted gay men by ruining their reputations. I must say, however, that an airport bathroom doesn't seem like a smart place to get your rocks off.

Good riddance, Larry Craig.

posted on Thursday, August 30, 2007 6:19:33 AM (Pacific Daylight Time, UTC-07:00) 
#    Comments [0]
Tuesday, February 06, 2007 

http://www.cartoonstock.com/newscartoons/cartoonists/efi/lowres/efin299l.jpg

Last year, the Washington State Supreme Court handed down its wrongheaded decision on same-sex marriage.

In a delightful piece of political theater, WA-DOMA has just filed ballot initiative I-957:

If passed by Washington voters, the Defense of Marriage Initiative would:

  • add the phrase, “who are capable of having children with one another” to the legal definition of marriage;

  • require that couples married in Washington file proof of procreation within three years of the date of marriage or have their marriage automatically annulled;

  • require that couples married out of state file proof of procreation within three years of the date of marriage or have their marriage classed as “unrecognized;”

  • establish a process for filing proof of procreation; and

  • make it a criminal act for people in an unrecognized marriage to receive marriage benefits.

The intent is to challenge the court's ruling which declares that a “legitimate state interest” allows the court to limit marriage to those couples able to have and raise children together, and hence it is permissible to bar same-sex marriage.

The initiative attacks the specious rationale for the court's ruling. It also attacks the framing that so many of the bigots use.

Three initiatives are planned:

  • Make procreation a requirement for legal marriage.

  • Prohibit divorce or legal separation when there are children.

  • Make the act of having a child together the equivalent of a legal ceremony.

As the sponsor of I-957 freely admits in his rationale, these are all absurd, and if passed, would be struck down by the Washington Supreme Court. He intends to undermine the reasoning of social conservatives who have long claimed that procreation is the sole purpose of marriage.

I'll sign the petition as soon as I get my hands on one, even though my own marriage would be annulled by the terms of the initiative.

posted on Wednesday, February 07, 2007 7:55:38 AM (Pacific Standard Time, UTC-08:00) 
#    Comments [0]
Thursday, August 10, 2006 

Via Peter, a site full of "inspirational" posters drawn from Star Trek in the vein of the satirical ones at Despair.com.

This poster of course plays on the trope of Kirk/Spock fan fiction, where Kirk and Spock are portrayed as lovers. Emma has long been a fan of slash, particularly pairings such as Solo/Kuryakin (Man from U.N.C.L.E.) and Jack O'Neill/Daniel Jackson (Stargate SG-1).

posted on Friday, August 11, 2006 1:28:24 AM (Pacific Daylight Time, UTC-07:00) 
#    Comments [0]
Tuesday, August 08, 2006 

I found this opinion piece on bisexuality by Matthew Parris in The Times of London:

In my Notebook column in The Times I have been recording, in an occasional way, candidates for inclusion in a speculative list of truths or nonsenses staring us in the face that we somehow cannot see: things future ages may dismiss with a snort — just as we look with incredulity at our forebears’ faith in the theory of the four bodily humours or possession by demons. Here is another modern candidate: the idea that there is a set of males called homosexuals, and another called heterosexuals, plus a handful in the middle called bisexuals who can’t decide. This, we shall one day realise, is a distorting glass through which to look at male sexuality.

... 

Make a horizontal line whose left margin represents a sexual orientation so completely heterosexual that such men have never felt, however fleetingly, any sexual attraction to another man; and whose right margin represents gay men utterly unteased by any other interest. Mark 30 million dots between these two poles, representing each of us men in Britain, located towards left or right depending on the balance of the attractions we’ve felt in our own life. How will the resulting scatter look as a shape?

If popular talk is to be believed, the shape would trace the silhouette of a wine glass lying leftwards on its side: long, thin stem in the middle, opening out to a big bowl on the left and a small base on the right. The large cluster (at least 80 per cent, the bowl) would be the “straights”. A much smaller but distinct cluster (perhaps 5 to 10 per cent, the base) would be the “gays”. The stem would be a thin scatter of “bisexuals”.

But if only we knew it, the true shape, I believe, would be closer to that of a champagne bottle lying rightwards on its side, its base to the left, tapering gently towards its mouth at the right. I think a substantial preponderance of men are more heterosexual than homosexual, but scattered fairly evenly between 100 per cent and half-and-half; and that the smaller number who think of ourselves as gay are likewise quite evenly distributed along the spectrum from the halfway point.

... 

If I am right, why have both the gay and the straight worlds so fiercely resisted the ambivalent and perhaps fluid analysis I propose?

... 

Secondly — and this is very important — the idea that many of us have a potentially variable sexuality opens up the uncomfortable possibility of personal choice; and we gays have lived in a transitional era in which we have very much wanted to believe and claim that “God made us” like this, and “we can’t help it”. Whether or not this is true, it is comforting for those troubled by suppressed guilt, and has provided a knock-down argument against those moral conservatives who say we could choose, and therefore should choose, not to be gay. It has also seemed to rebut the complaint that homosexuality could be “promoted” or that gay men might “corrupt” potential heterosexuals. What, however, has not yet dawned on still embattled crusaders for equality is that true equality — equality of self-regard as well as public esteem — will have arrived when we are as careless as a blond or a redhead might be whether or not we were made that way.

Does “I can’t help being black” strike you as a self-respecting argument against racism? That “I can’t help it” is a subtly self-oppressing argument for acceptance does not seem to have occurred to supposedly liberated gay activists, for whom it has always been the easiest way of ending the argument.

But it is intellectually sloppy (would you accept it from a child molester?), calculated to close off troubling thoughts about might-have-beens, and no answer to the Christian evangelists’ insulting talk of cures for our “affliction”. We retreat into a simple, bipolar world of can’t-help-it straights and can’t-help-it gays. We push these feelings and people into closets marked “latent” homosexuality, “in-denial” homosexuality and “confused” homosexuality.

I think sexuality is a supple as well as subtle thing, and can sometimes be influenced, even promoted; I think that in some people some drives can be discouraged and others encouraged; I think some people can choose. I wish I were conscious of being able to. I would choose to be gay.

I do think that sexual orientation is largely innate. How we express our sexuality is a matter of choice. We should indeed be able to make an unfettered choice of which consenting adults we wish to love, to share our lives with, and to fuck.

It is wrong to discriminate on grounds of inborn characteristics (race, gender) and on chosen categories (religion, political affiliation). Religious identity is clearly a matter of choice, although far too many people uncritically accept the religion of their parents.

Like Parris, I don't care for the I-was-born-this-way defense of sexual orientation. We should be arguing for the freedom to live our own lives as we see fit.

posted on Wednesday, August 09, 2006 5:48:35 AM (Pacific Daylight Time, UTC-07:00) 
#    Comments [0]
Thursday, July 27, 2006 

Well, fuck! The Washington State Supreme Court handed down its long-awaited decision today on the constitionality of the state's Defense of Marriage Act. Somehow, they found that it didn't violate the state constitution's Equal Protection clause.

No same-sex marriages in Washington state anytime soon.

I attended the rally at the First Baptist church earlier this evening. (Find me in the photo!) Some anger, some disappointment. Mostly upbeat. The young Latina couple were very affecting. The Serkin-Pooles invited everyone to join their club, as they announced their formal engagement to each other. One speaker pointed out that even if the court had handed down a favorable decision, the process would not have been over.

Tomorrow we fight another day. I've been supporting same-sex marriage since 1993, when I heard of the Hawaii Equal Rights Marriage Project. I didn't expect the war to end today, though it would have been nice to win this battle.

The LMA have more on what it all means.

Dahlia Lithwick at Slate ably skewers the court's decision in Rational Lampoon:

If you vote to uphold the ban, on the other hand, you'll get to join your colleagues on the New York and Nebraska courts, who just did the same thing. You'll also find yourself in the warm embrace of your buddies on the Georgia and Tennessee courts (who ultimately ruled against gay marriage in recent weeks on narrower, more technical, terms). Nobody will excoriate you in the op-ed pages. Instead of causing widespread fury, you will unleash, at most, widespread resignation.

Still, you feel bad. You hold no personal animus toward gay people. You even think there is something slightly mean-spirited behind your state's Defense of Marriage Act. You talk it over with your wife/husband/clerks. It's a pickle. Months pass.

Until you hit upon the solution: Shift the blame. Make the legislature the bad guys. Find a way to frame the ban on gay marriage that makes it impossible to strike down. Rule that unless the ban is utterly insane, it's constitutional. Suggest that as long as the legislature passed it, it must be rational. Use the word "deferential" six times.

The key to appearing reasonable will be to vilify the dissenters. You'll want to use your majority opinion to emphasize that judges who vote their "personal views" are behaving like "legislators." Quote liberal lion Supreme Court Justice John Paul Stevens for that proposition. Then condemn—without quite using the words "judicial activist"—the dissenters for having been "uncharacteristically … led to depart significantly from the court's limited role when deciding constitutional challenges."

Be sure to tell your "readers unfamiliar with appellate court review" that your state's decision to ban gay marriage is solely the fault of the legislature. Because you yourself, of course, still love everyone.

posted on Thursday, July 27, 2006 7:16:39 AM (Pacific Daylight Time, UTC-07:00) 
#    Comments [0]
Wednesday, May 24, 2006 

AmericaBlog links to a CNN segment on the quacks who claim they can "cure" homosexuality.

Very creepy. Very bogus. And typical of so-called reparative therapy.

I believe that those "ex-gays" who do manage to make a go of it are bisexual rather than gay. In other words, they're no more than 5 on the Kinsey scale.

And I'm not the only one.

posted on Wednesday, May 24, 2006 8:12:07 PM (Pacific Daylight Time, UTC-07:00) 
#    Comments [0]
Friday, May 19, 2006 

I just listened to This American Life on the radio. I am continually amazed at just how good this show is. They find so many compelling stories.

This week, Ira Glass interviewed Gene Cheek, who wrote a memoir, The Color of Love: A Mother's Choice in the Jim Crow South.

In the early 1960s, Cheek's divorced mother fell in love with Tuck, a black man. They lived in a small town in North Carolina, and the miscegenation laws were still on the books. They dated clandestinely, but eventually their relationship become known. The police would stop by regularly to harass them. After she had a baby by Tuck, her own family refused to have anything to do with her.

One day, Cheek's mother went to court, in an attempt to collect child-support payments for Gene from his alcoholic father. When she and Gene got there, they realized that the case being heard was a child-custody case. She was given the ultimatum: give up her infant mixed-race son or give up her 12-year-old son. His father said that he couldn't take Gene in, and neither could his uncle or his grandmother. Gene volunteered to leave his mother, and he was sent to a foster home. He began acting out and was eventually sent to a boy's prison, 200 miles from home, where he spent five years.

Years later, after the ban on interracial marriages was overturned in Loving v. Virgina, Cheek's mother married Tuck.

I was horrified by this story, by the barbarity of it, by the racism. Thank God this can no longer happen.

Yet it does. Gay parents still have to contend with the presumption that they are unfit parents in more benighted parts of the country. Fortunately, Lawrence v. Texas is overturning this presumption, but this issue is far from settled. The bigots are pushing to enact a Federal Marriage Amendment (HRC, Wikipedia) which would certainly affect custody rights for LGBT parents.

posted on Saturday, May 20, 2006 3:12:47 AM (Pacific Daylight Time, UTC-07:00) 
#    Comments [0]
Tuesday, March 21, 2006 

I often complain about being busy, no doubt because I have a talent for complicating my life. Things were relatively quiet for a while, but that's not true anymore.

At work, we're close to releasing the first version of our product. Happily, crunch time at Atlas isn't nearly as bad as it was at Microsoft. Instead of working eight-ish hours a day, it's more like nine or maybe ten. The pressure level has risen, of course, but it's far from intolerable.

The real busyness is in my extracurricular life. I'm the president of BiNet Seattle, a bisexual community group, and have been for the last three years. I also do a hell of a lot of the work and I'm burning out. I recently gave notice that I'm stepping down. (It looks like a successor has been found.) Meanwhile, a lot of planning is going on in an effort to revitalize BiNet, as attendance has been dragging.

For the last few years, I've also been heavily involved with The Wild Geese Players of Seattle, as the webmaster and the co-dramaturge. We do readings of Irish literature, particularly that of James Joyce and W.B. Yeats. Every June 16th (Bloomsday), we do a staged reading of a chapter of Ulysses. This year, the longtime director has moved back to Northern Ireland. Currently, I am acting as the director, on top of my other roles, but I don't think I'm the right person for the job, and I'm hoping to find a replacement soon.

I'm a member of Freely Speaking Toastmasters, an LGBT speaking club. I've been working on my CTM for far too long, and I intend to knock off the final three speeches this year.

I resume my woodworking class next week, which is going to tie up ten Tuesday evenings. I haven't decided yet what I'm going to work on this time. In previous years, I built a very nice set of nesting tables and an unsatisfactory pair of bar stools.

In my Copious Spare Time, I'm also making occasional contributions to two open source projects, DasBlog and Vim. I made Vim compile with VC5-VC8, and I promised Bram that I would provide some documentation on debugging Vim with WinDbg and dealing with minidumps. I'd also like to produce a native Win64 version. With DasBlog, I've provided some feedback on the usability of the installation instructions, as well as a fix for dodgy permalinks. I'd also like to make use of my former expertise on IIS performance (see 25+ Tips, 10 Commandments, IIS 5 Tuning, and Professional ASP 3.0) to do some performance tuning of DasBlog.

I'd also like to fit in some time for photography; for reading my way through our enormous backlog of books and magazines; writing the occasional blog post; cooking; bicycle riding; traveling; working out; hanging out with my wife; socializing with my friends; movies; and more. Not to mention all the very dull projects around the house and garden that I've neglected.

posted on Tuesday, March 21, 2006 7:36:59 AM (Pacific Daylight Time, UTC-07:00) 
#    Comments [1]
Thursday, March 16, 2006 

I was born 41 years ago today. (Technically, yesterday, as it's now the early hours of March 16th.) I was to have been called Vincent after my father, but my mother's father, George Victor Clery, had died just 12 days before. I was baptised George Vincent Reilly on March 17th, St. Patrick's Day.

Beware the Ides of March, I tell people: You might have to buy George a present. Better a birthday present than the reception that Julius Caesar received on March 15th, 44BC.

I've never liked the name George all that much, but I've never disliked it enough to do anything about it. (Emma legally changed her entire name about ten years ago.) "George" has the advantage that it's largely gone out of fashion, but everyone recognizes it. How many Jeffs and Mikes and Scotts do you know? And how many Georges?

I realized over dinner with Emma that 15 years ago today, I took a momentous step: I came out as bisexual. It scared the hell out of me at the time. It hasn't always been easy. But it was definitely the right thing to do.

posted on Thursday, March 16, 2006 8:23:54 AM (Pacific Daylight Time, UTC-07:00) 
#    Comments [1]
Wednesday, February 11, 2004 

http://www.tedkennedy.com/page/file/1c51c6fd0c43cefa9c_f9bmv2z3d.gif/FMA2.gif

(Originally posted to Queer at EraBlog on Wed, 11 Feb 2004 23:48:38 GMT)

George W. Bush, after months of hinting that he would support the Federal Marriage Amendment, has endorsed it. He's desparately trying to change the subject from whether he was AWOL from the National Guard in Alabama.

The Human Rights Campaign is urging everyone to oppose this. They provide a sample letter to send to your representatives, but I threw it away and wrote my own (below), which has been sent to my representatives, via the HRC Action Center.

The Bush Administration pisses me off on so many levels. I'm particularly infuriated about Bush's support for the Federal Marriage Amendment. After hinting that he'd support it for the last few months, he's now trying to change the subject from the charges that he was AWOL from the Air National Guard.

The FMA is a rabble-rousing exercise cooked up by the likes to Donald Wildmon to invigorate the religious right. Once again, the know-nothing bible thumpers are demonizing gay people. I'm sick of it.

Specious arguments about the sanctity of marriage fall flat when you consider that 50% of marriages end in divorce and Britney Spear's frivolous prank has more legal standing than a gay couple that have been together for decades.

The federal government has no business interfering in marriage. That's the states' prerogative.

Several commentators have argued that not only would the FMA forbid gay marriage, it would also void any civil unions legislation that some states may pass.

We should be following the example of most Western European nations and decoupling the civil and religious aspects of marriage. The state and only the state can marry you. A religious wedding has no legal significance. I don't expect this to happen in the US anytime soon. So much for the Separation of Church and State.

I fully expect you to vigorously oppose the FMA.

I would very much like for you to support gay marriage, or at least civil unions.

My representatives are Rep. Jim McDermott, Sen. Patty Murray, and Sen. Maria Cantwell, Jim McDermott is very liberal and needs no urging to oppose it; Cantwell and Murray are fairly liberal, but it does no harm to stiffen their spines. Or for me to vent.

posted on Wednesday, February 11, 2004 10:26:15 AM (Pacific Standard Time, UTC-08:00) 
#    Comments [0]
Tuesday, December 02, 2003 

http://www.amnestyusa.org/success/i/sharipov.jpg

(Originally posted to Politics at EraBlog on Tue, 02 Dec 2003 08:32:12 GMT)

I sign a lot of petitions. Here's one that I wrote a custom letter for.

First, the background.

From: "John - THE LIST" <john@gayadvocacy.com> Sent: Monday, December 01, 2003 6:24 PM Subject: THE LIST: Action Alert - Free Ruslan Sharipov THE LIST - Special Alert for Gay Torture Victim

Washington, DC December 1, 2003

Ruslan Sharipov, a journalist in Uzbekistan, is being imprisoned and tortured because he's gay. His government captors have threatened to rape him with a bottle and inject him with AIDS. But there is talk that the government may soon amnesty a few political prisoners. Let's make sure he is one of them by emailing the 3 key US officials below, demanding they tell the Uzbek government to free Ruslan Sharipov.

I've managed to get the direct email addresses for these rather high-ranking US officials. Let's take advantage of our luck. And if you're not American, no matter - it's still good for them to hear that people around the world are watching America's actions on this important case:

You can read more about Ruslan's case at the Human Rights Watch Web site. BACKGROUND

Earlier this year, openly-gay journalist Ruslan Sharipov was given a five-year prison term by the Uzbek government simply because he is an openly-gay advocate for human rights in his Stalinist homeland. In the six months he's already been in prison, the 25-year-old Ruslan has been physically and mentally tortured, and forced to write his own suicide note. WHY YOUR EMAILS MATTER

This month, December 2003, the Uzbek government, under intense international pressure from groups like Human Rights Watch and Amnesty International, is reportedly considering freeing some of its 7,000 to 10,000 political prisoners. We need to make sure that Ruslan is among those freed.

I have it on good authority that senior US officials do not believe the American people care about Ruslan's imprisonment and torture. They think we don't care that the Bush Administration is giving Uzbekistan $500 million a year in aid, much of it going towards training the very state security apparatus that tortures gays and lesbians and other political prisoners. And they think we don't care that earlier this year two political prisoners were boiled alive, and that our tax money helps all of this happen. IT'S TIME TO TELL THE US GOVERNMENT WE DO CARE.

President Bush tells us he's fighting for freedom and democracy in Iraq, then supports a brutal dictator next door. President Bush needs to start practicing what he preaches. He should tell the government of Uzbekistan to free gay journalist Ruslan Sharipov. Again, those email addresses are: - grossmanM2@state.gov - AppletonDE@state.gov - cranerlx@state.gov

  • grossmanM2@state.gov

  • AppletonDE@state.gov

  • cranerlx@state.gov

Thanks so much, and please share this email alert with all of your friends and colleagues. I truly believe that if we all get involved now, this is one we can win in no time. (I'm doing this update as a text-only version so you can easily forward it by email to your friends and colleagues.)

JOHN ARAVOSIS Editor, THE LIST and HateCrime.org Washington, DC

PS For more information on Ruslan's case, visit Human Rights Watch Web site.

Here's the letter that I sent.

From: George V. Reilly To: grossmanM2@state.gov ; AppletonDE@state.gov ; cranerlx@state.gov Sent: Tuesday, December 02, 2003 12:03 AM Subject: Free Ruslan Sharipov

The Bush Administration has taken to arguing that the US invaded Iraq to save the Iraqi people from the brutality and torture of Saddam Hussein's regime, and to bring democracy. It's unquestionably good that the torturers of Iraq are gone.

But the Administration has also given $500 million to Uzbekistan, where political prisoners have been boiled alive. Have we learned nothing from the past? Saddam was once our puppet, as were many other dictators in Latin America, Africa, and elsewhere. The CIA helped overthrow Mossadegh's democratically elected government in Iran in 1953, to our lasting cost. Supporting brutal dictators may help our strategic position in the short term, but it makes us look like hypocrites. Can we not do better than this?

I am particularly concerned about the plight of Ruslan Sharipov, the gay journalist and human rights advocate who has been imprisoned in Uzbekistan on trumped-up charges. I ask you to call upon the Uzbek government to free Sharipov and other political prisoners.

/George V. Reilly

Seattle, WA

May it do some good.

Update: Ruslan was released and granted asylum in the U.S..

posted on Tuesday, December 02, 2003 10:23:32 AM (Pacific Standard Time, UTC-08:00) 
#    Comments [0]
Friday, February 07, 2003 

(Originally posted to Queer at EraBlog on Fri, 07 Feb 2003 08:51:06 GMT)

Amy Sohn writes about Hasbians: Women who came out of the closet only to end up in heterosexual relationships.

I came out as bi in 1991. I was very careful never to call myself "gay" because that label never fit me. Even so, that must have been what many people heard, because only that can explain their surprise when I told them a few years later that I had fallen in love with Emma and was going to marry her.

Now many people believe I'm heterosexual, unless I take the trouble to educate them. Bisexual Invisibility. <sigh>

posted on Saturday, February 08, 2003 7:00:56 AM (Pacific Standard Time, UTC-08:00) 
#    Comments [0]