Tuesday, November 15, 2005 
« Dueling Poets: W. B. Yeats vs. Walt Whit... | Main | Skype and SSL »

Last Wednesday night, Emma emailed a dozen of our friends, inviting them to join us for Thanksgiving dinner. One reply arrived the next morning. Then nothing.

By Sunday evening, I had grown exasperated enough to send out a snarky followup:

The courtesy of a belated reply would be appreciated. So far, we've got exactly one RSVP.

It served its purpose. Replies cascaded in. Most, alas, said "no"; they had other plans.

Would that this were an isolated incident. Time and again, I've issued invitations that were not responded to. A simple "yes" or "no" is ideal. A "maybe" is acceptable too, especially if you follow up with a "yes" or a "no".

RSVP is not a meaningless formality. It's a vital planning aid. I need to know ahead of time whether to expect three or thirteen for a dinner party. It's rude and thoughtless to leave me hanging in limbo. If I assume that everyone who's been invited will show up, and cater accordingly, and many of them don't come, I've gone to needless expense and effort. If I guess that only half those invited will turn up, and I underestimate, then I'm embarrassed by not being able to feed my guests properly.

It's almost as big a sin for you to say "yes", then fail to show, without a word of warning.

When the stakes are low, such as a large drinks party, the lack of RSVPs is a minor matter. For a major production, it's inconsiderate at best.

posted on Wednesday, November 16, 2005 3:11:45 AM (Pacific Standard Time, UTC-08:00) 
#    Comments [1]
Related posts:
#1 Technical Blog, revisited
Hardware Lazarus
Nader's irrelevancy
Henry IV
Games Night
#1 Technical Blog
Thursday, November 24, 2005 6:44:19 AM (Pacific Standard Time, UTC-08:00)
Most of the people I know always say that an RSVP is only used if you are NOT coming. So you think no one is coming then you get 20 people show up at your door.
Comments are closed.